Scholars have read this story as a parable of Consumer capitalism [1][2]. It has also been discussed as dramatizing a girl's sad awareness of menstruation in the context of an unsympathetic mother and a disgusted father [3]
Cultural references
Elizabeth Gaskell’s Mary Barton (1849) alludes to Edgeworth’s story. The character Rose Campbell in Louisa May Alcott's "Eight Cousins" (1875) refers to the story: "I always thought it very unfair in her mother not to warn the poor thing a little bit; and she was regularly mean when Rosamond asked for a bowl to put the purple stuff in, and she said, in such a provoking way, 'I did not agree to lend you a bowl, but I will, my dear.' Ugh! I always want to shake that hateful woman, though she was a moral mamma." A character in E. Nesbit’s 1913 “Wet Magic,” alludes to the “icy voice” of Rosamond’s mother, “the one who was so hateful about the purple jar.”
"The Purple Jar" was also read by Princess Victoria, Theodore Roosevelt (who admired it), Eudora Welty (who did not), and the actress Fanny Kemble [4]
The title of this painting is taken from a series of moralising tales for children written by Maria Edgworth in 1823. Rosamund decides to buy a large jar of purple liquid she had seen in a chemist’s shop window, rather than a new pair of shoes. In this painting her delight turns to dismay as she realises that she will be confined indoors because her shoes are too uncomfortable to wear.
Edgworth was writing at a time when nearly all literature intended for children was didactic in intention, though these moral tales remain very popular today.
No comments:
Post a Comment